GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.17
+23.2%

P4200 outperforms GTX 1650 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking213269
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.84
Power efficiency17.2618.67
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304896
Core clock speed1227 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate237.293.24
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4200 25.17
+23.2%
GTX 1650 20.43

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10491
+33.2%
GTX 1650 7874

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P4200 38375
GTX 1650 39171
+2.1%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P4200 37676
GTX 1650 39941
+6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+23.2%
69
−23.2%
1440p45−50
+15.4%
39
−15.4%
4K27−30
+22.7%
22
−22.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.16
1440pno data3.82
4Kno data6.77

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+3.8%
53
−3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−9.3%
47
+9.3%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+3.8%
79
−3.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−2%
52
+2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−10.3%
64
+10.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−21.2%
80
+21.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−56.8%
229
+56.8%
Hitman 3 50−55
+4.1%
49
−4.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−152%
292
+152%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−17.4%
101
+17.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−18.5%
77
+18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−35.3%
115
+35.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−117%
224
+117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−50.9%
83
+50.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+22.9%
35
−22.9%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+13.9%
72
−13.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+10.9%
46
−10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+11.5%
52
−11.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+17.9%
56
−17.9%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−37.7%
201
+37.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+8.5%
47
−8.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−124%
260
+124%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+21.1%
71
−21.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+18.2%
55
−18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+14.9%
74
−14.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+17.4%
45−50
−17.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−100%
206
+100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+120%
25
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+231%
13
−231%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+538%
8
−538%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+48.7%
39
−48.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+125%
65
−125%
Hitman 3 50−55
+24.4%
41
−24.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+93.3%
60
−93.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+37.1%
62
−37.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+28.6%
42
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+390%
21
−390%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+20.4%
54
−20.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+14.3%
42
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+5.6%
36
−5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+44.4%
18
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+92.3%
13
−92.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+20.8%
24
−20.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+18%
122
−18%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+20.9%
43
−20.9%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+17.1%
41
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+22.2%
45
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−2.1%
145
+2.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+20%
35
−20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+25%
20
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Hitman 3 20−22
+53.8%
13
−53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+215%
41
−215%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+7.4%
27
−7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+3.8%
26
−3.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+15.4%
13
−15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+180%
5
−180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+19.2%
26
−19.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+37.5%
8
−37.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+29.4%
17
−29.4%

This is how Quadro P4200 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 15% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 23% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 538% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 152% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 57 tests (79%)
  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 15 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.17 20.43
Recency 21 February 2018 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 23.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 23772 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.