GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.17
+36.3%

P4200 outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking213300
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiency17.2625.32
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1227 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate237.299.84
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4200 25.17
+36.3%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10491
+47.4%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+29.3%
58
−29.3%
1440p50−55
+35.1%
37
−35.1%
4K27−30
+35%
20
−35%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−26.8%
52
+26.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+2.4%
42
−2.4%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+1.2%
81
−1.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−13.8%
66
+13.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−19.7%
79
+19.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−13.7%
166
+13.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+8.5%
47
−8.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−41.4%
164
+41.4%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+4.9%
82
−4.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−9.2%
71
+9.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−37.6%
117
+37.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−41.7%
146
+41.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−45.5%
80
+45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+79.2%
24
−79.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+17.1%
70
−17.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+8.5%
47
−8.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+28.1%
32
−28.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+9.4%
53
−9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+22.2%
54
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−1.4%
148
+1.4%
Hitman 3 50−55
+21.4%
42
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−27.6%
148
+27.6%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+26.5%
68
−26.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+18.2%
55
−18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+32.8%
64
−32.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+28.6%
40−45
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−36.9%
141
+36.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+83.3%
30
−83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+438%
8
−438%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+50%
34
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+36.7%
30
−36.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+45%
40
−45%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+135%
62
−135%
Hitman 3 50−55
+37.8%
37
−37.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+104%
57
−104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+54.5%
55
−54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+50%
36
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+506%
17
−506%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+25%
52
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+11.6%
43
−11.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+11.8%
34
−11.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+18.2%
22
−18.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.7%
15
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+16%
25
−16%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+45.5%
99
−45.5%
Hitman 3 30−33
+15.4%
26
−15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+18.2%
44
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+23.1%
39
−23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+52.8%
35−40
−52.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+23.5%
115
−23.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+27.3%
33
−27.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+19%
21
−19%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+187%
45
−187%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+11.5%
26
−11.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+28.6%
21
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+25%
12
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5
−20%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+55%
20−22
−55%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+29.4%
17
−29.4%

This is how Quadro P4200 and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 35% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 35% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 506% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 45% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 57 tests (79%)
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 12 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.17 18.47
Recency 21 February 2018 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 36.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3306 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.