Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 and Quadro P2000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.13
+56.8%

P4200 outperforms P2000 Mobile by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking209330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.1315.42
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP106
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)15 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041152
Core clock speed1227 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1291 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate237.292.95
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3.75 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.16.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+64%
50−55
−64%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+62.2%
90−95
−62.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+65.7%
70−75
−65.7%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+58.5%
65−70
−58.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+64%
50−55
−64%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+62.2%
90−95
−62.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+65.7%
70−75
−65.7%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+72%
50−55
−72%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+58.5%
65−70
−58.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+62.2%
90−95
−62.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
+70%
30−33
−70%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+65.7%
70−75
−65.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+58.5%
65−70
−58.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+62.5%
40−45
−62.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+60%
90−95
−60%
Hitman 3 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+57.8%
90−95
−57.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Hitman 3 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+61.3%
80−85
−61.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.13 16.03
Recency 21 February 2018 15 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3.75 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 56.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 113.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

P2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 105 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.