UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.72
+4.9%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking655669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.62
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
1440p25
+19%
21−24
−19%
4K12
+20%
10−12
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 18
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Fortnite 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Valorant 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 16
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry 5 13
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Fortnite 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Valorant 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 12
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Valorant 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 13% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 19% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 20% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 50% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 32 tests (54%)
  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 4 tests (7%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.72 4.50
Recency 11 May 2021 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 4.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics 750.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
ATI HD 5830 Radeon HD 5830
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
RX 570X Radeon RX 570X
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
GTX 670M GeForce GTX 670M
RX 5300 RX 5300
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB 3050 8 GB
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
vs
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
GT 1030 DDR4 GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
HD 8970M Radeon HD 8970M
vs
HD 8750M Radeon HD 8750M
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080
vs
PRO W7800 Radeon PRO W7800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 406 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.