UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Place in the ranking	657	662
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.24	20.70
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	256
Core clock speed	350 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	20.80
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

18
+12.5%

16−18

−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Elden Ring	13 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	21 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	17 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Dota 2	15 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Elden Ring	10 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry 5	22 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Fortnite	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	17 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
World of Tanks	25 −200%	75−80 +200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Dota 2	24 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	14 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Valorant	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Elden Ring	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
World of Tanks	30−35 +3.1%	30−35 −3.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Fortnite	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Valorant	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 13% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 89% faster.
in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games: