UHD Graphics 730 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.73
+13.4%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics 730 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking649688
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Power efficiencyno data19.14
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32192
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
1440p25
+19%
21−24
−19%
4K12
+20%
10−12
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Elden Ring 12
+20%
10−11
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Valorant 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Dota 2 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Elden Ring 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Fortnite 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
World of Tanks 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Dota 2 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Valorant 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Elden Ring 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
World of Tanks 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Valorant 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 29% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 19% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.73 4.17
Recency 11 May 2021 3 January 2023

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 13.4% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1297 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.