Arc A310 vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	573	366
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.71	13.26
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	768
Core clock speed	350 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	64.00
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	16
TMUs	24	32
Tensor Cores	no data	96
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	124.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.39

Arc A310 14.26
+123%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465

Arc A310 5502
+123%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

16−18

−144%

39
+144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1375%	55−60 +1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −207%	85−90 +207%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1525%	65 +1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −356%	40−45 +356%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −207%	85−90 +207%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1250%	54 +1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −222%	29 +222%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −207%	85−90 +207%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1350%

27−30
+1350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−700%

16−18
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Arc A310 compete in popular games:

Arc A310 is 144% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A310 is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A310 is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.39	14.26
Recency	24 May 2018	12 October 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has a 123.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A310 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.