Arc A380 vs UHD Graphics P630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2018
15 Watt
6.40

Arc A380 outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking575334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.00
Power efficiency29.2514.75
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 May 2018 (6 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921024
Core clock speed350 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80131.2
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.40
Arc A380 16.11
+152%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
Arc A380 6207
+152%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−161%
47
+161%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1550%
130−140
+1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−304%
110−120
+304%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2300%
72
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1550%
130−140
+1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1900%
80
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−304%
110−120
+304%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−867%
29
+867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−550%
52
+550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1425%
61
+1425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−278%
34
+278%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+12%
25
−12%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 16−18

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+0%
37
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 161% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 12% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A380 is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 24 tests (37%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.40 16.11
Recency 24 May 2018 14 June 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 151.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 838 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.