Radeon RX 7600M XT vs UHD Graphics P630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2020
15 Watt
6.39

RX 7600M XT outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a whopping 435% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking569151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.5819.77
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed350 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80316.0
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs24128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.11.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.39
RX 7600M XT 34.16
+435%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
RX 7600M XT 13184
+435%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−471%
120
+471%
1440p10−12
−540%
64
+540%
4K6−7
−483%
35
+483%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4267%
131
+4267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1575%
130−140
+1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2525%
100−110
+2525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−7800%
237
+7800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1575%
130−140
+1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5100%
208
+5100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−611%
60−65
+611%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2733%
85
+2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1650%
140
+1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4400%
180
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1011%
100
+1011%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−114%
60
+114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Hitman 3 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−5200%
106
+5200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 30

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139
+0%
139
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
+0%
114
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 142
+0%
142
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+0%
62
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+0%
67
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+0%
120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+0%
22
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 471% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 540% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 483% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 7800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.39 34.16
Recency 13 May 2020 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 700% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 434.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 66 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.