UHD Graphics P630 vs GeForce MX250

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX250 and UHD Graphics P630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX250
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
6.24

UHD Graphics P630 outperforms MX250 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency42.7829.25
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP108BCoffee Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 February 2019 (5 years ago)24 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed937 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9128.80
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX250 6.24
UHD Graphics P630 6.40
+2.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX250 2405
UHD Graphics P630 2465
+2.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Hitman 3 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+1375%
8−9
−1375%
Metro Exodus 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
+775%
4−5
−775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 76
+171%
27−30
−171%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Hitman 3 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
+1338%
8−9
−1338%
Metro Exodus 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 22
+450%
4−5
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
+154%
27−30
−154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
+100%
8−9
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+82.1%
27−30
−82.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

This is how GeForce MX250 and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX250 is 5% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX250 is 1375% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX250 surpassed UHD Graphics P630 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.24 6.40
Recency 20 February 2019 24 May 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX250 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 50% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX250 and UHD Graphics P630.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250
Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1556 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.