Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in performance ranking	571	130
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	7.12
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 (2017)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Coffee-Lake-GT2	Vega 20
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 October 2017 (6 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	4096
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	440.3
Floating-point performance	0.4608 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	Apple MPX
Width	IGP	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	32 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	1.02 TB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.39

Pro Vega II Duo 36.34
+469%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465

Pro Vega II Duo 14018
+469%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3
−400%

10−11

+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −436%	150−160 +436%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −436%	150−160 +436%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −436%	150−160 +436%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−400%

10−11

+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−400%

10−11

+400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.39	36.34
Recency	1 October 2017	3 June 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	475 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 3066.7% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II Duo, on the other hand, has a 468.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.