Quadro P1000 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Quadro P1000, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.05

P1000 outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking481415
Place by popularity34not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.79
Power efficiency41.3619.86
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVegaGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)7 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512640
Core clock speedno data1493 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.61
Floating-point processing powerno data1.555 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9.05
Quadro P1000 11.59
+28.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5891
Quadro P1000 6001
+1.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 22428
Quadro P1000 24240
+8.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 3743
Quadro P1000 4787
+27.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 27084
Quadro P1000 30721
+13.4%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 1163
Quadro P1000 1395
+19.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 37
Quadro P1000 42
+15.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 63
Quadro P1000 87
+37.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 21
Quadro P1000 56
+165%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 42
Quadro P1000 54
+29.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 36
Quadro P1000 57
+57.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 15
Quadro P1000 15
+0.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 17
Quadro P1000 27
+57.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 1
Quadro P1000 4
+457%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 47
Quadro P1000 53
+12.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−100%
44
+100%
1440p16
−12.5%
18−21
+12.5%
4K9
−11.1%
10−12
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.52
1440pno data20.83
4Kno data37.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−77%
108
+77%
Hitman 3 15
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−21.6%
60−65
+21.6%
Metro Exodus 35
−8.6%
35−40
+8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
−47.2%
53
+47.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−80%
18−20
+80%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−63.9%
100
+63.9%
Hitman 3 15
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−21.6%
60−65
+21.6%
Metro Exodus 25
−52%
35−40
+52%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−28%
30−35
+28%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−37%
35−40
+37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−16%
27−30
+16%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−100%
18−20
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−24.6%
75−80
+24.6%
Hitman 3 14
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
−158%
60−65
+158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−60.9%
35−40
+60.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−14.3%
16
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−467%
65−70
+467%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Hitman 3 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Metro Exodus 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−22%
70−75
+22%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Hitman 3 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−43.2%
50−55
+43.2%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is 100% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P1000 is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 38% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P1000 is 467% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • Quadro P1000 is ahead in 66 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.05 11.59
Recency 7 January 2020 7 February 2017
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P1000, on the other hand, has a 28.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1183 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 573 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.