Quadro M2000 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.05

M2000 outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking481442
Place by popularity34not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.63
Power efficiency41.349.45
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVegaGM206
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speedno data796 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data55.82
Floating-point processing powerno data1.786 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno data128 Bit
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1653 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 106 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
1440p16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
4K9
−11.1%
10−12
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data18.24
1440pno data24.32
4Kno data43.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Hitman 3 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Hitman 3 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Metro Exodus 25
−8%
27−30
+8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Hitman 3 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Hitman 3 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Quadro M2000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M2000 is 9% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M2000 is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M2000 is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.05 10.34
Recency 7 January 2020 8 April 2016
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro M2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GTX 960A GeForce GTX 960A
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R3 Graphics Radeon R3 Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 1183 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 210 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.