Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce 9650M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9650M GS with Radeon PRO W7800, including specs and performance data.

9650M GS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 29 Watt
0.60

PRO W7800 outperforms 9650M GS by a whopping 10720% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.66
Power efficiency1.6419.79
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameG84Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2008 (16 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324480
Core clock speed625 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors289 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00707.0
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9650M GS 0.60
PRO W7800 64.92
+10720%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9650M GS 270
PRO W7800 29010
+10644%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−10525%
850−900
+10525%
Valorant 27−30
−10590%
3100−3150
+10590%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−10689%
2050−2100
+10689%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
Dota 2 12−14
−10317%
1250−1300
+10317%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−10525%
850−900
+10525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
Valorant 27−30
−10590%
3100−3150
+10590%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
Dota 2 12−14
−10317%
1250−1300
+10317%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−10525%
850−900
+10525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%
Valorant 27−30
−10590%
3100−3150
+10590%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−9900%
600−650
+9900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−10567%
1600−1650
+10567%
Valorant 4−5
−9900%
400−450
+9900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 64.92
Recency 13 March 2008 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 260 Watt

9650M GS has 796.6% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has a 10720% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9650M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9650M GS is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
GeForce 9650M GS
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 36 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9650M GS or Radeon PRO W7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.