Apple M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.14
+16.5%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Apple M2 Max by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking344456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Apple M-Series
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache8 MB36 MB
L3 cache16 MB48 MB
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt79 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.14
+16.5%
Apple M2 Max 14.71

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Apple M2 Max by 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26515
+0.2%
Apple M2 Max 26457

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+17.1%
Apple M2 Max 2084

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Apple M2 Max by 17% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+14%
Apple M2 Max 236

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Apple M2 Max by 14% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.14 14.71
Recency 13 June 2023 17 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 79 Watt

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Max in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 46 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 220 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.