Apple M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.66
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.67
+0.1%

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking410409
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Apple M-Series
Power efficiency45.3020.08
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)17 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache8 MB36 MB
L3 cache16 MB48 MB
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt79 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare Radeon 780M and Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.66
Apple M2 Max 16.67
+0.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26729
Apple M2 Max 26739
+0%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+17.1%
Apple M2 Max 2084

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+14%
Apple M2 Max 236

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
Apple M2 Max 15373
+39.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
Apple M2 Max 1967
+4.2%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363
Apple M2 Max 405
+11.4%

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1620
Apple M2 Max 1835
+13.2%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 242
Apple M2 Max 259
+7%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 12457
Apple M2 Max 14863
+19.3%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2581
Apple M2 Max 2692
+4.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.66 16.67
Recency 13 June 2023 17 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 79 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has an age advantage of 4 months, 33.3% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 125.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 0.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and M2 Max.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 60 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 238 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and M2 Max, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.