Duron 650 vs GX-210JA
Primary details
Comparing GX-210JA and Duron 650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3364 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD | AMD Duron |
| Power efficiency | 2.38 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Temash (2013) | Spitfire (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 19 June 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $154 |
Detailed specifications
GX-210JA and Duron 650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 0.65 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 6.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on GX-210JA and Duron 650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FT3 BGA | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 29.4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Duron 650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Duron 650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 19 June 2000 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 29 Watt |
GX-210JA has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 383.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and Duron 650. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while Duron 650 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
