3020e vs GX-210JA
Aggregate performance score
3020e outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing GX-210JA and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3364 | 2207 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 2.38 | 23.81 |
| Architecture codename | Temash (2013) | Dali (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
GX-210JA and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on GX-210JA and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FT3 BGA | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 1.50 |
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 4 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
3020e has a 900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
