Athlon MP 1600+ vs GX-210JA

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMDAMD Athlon MP
Power efficiency2.52no data
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 October 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$210

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data10.5
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
Chip lithography28 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data128 mm2
Number of transistorsno data38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT3 BGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt62.8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 15 October 2001
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 62 Watt

GX-210JA has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 1600+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
AMD Athlon MP 1600+
Athlon MP 1600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or Athlon MP 1600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.