Athlon MP 1600+ vs GX-210JA
Primary details
Comparing GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD | AMD Athlon MP |
| Architecture codename | Temash (2013) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 15 October 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $210 |
Detailed specifications
GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 10.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 128 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 38 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FT3 BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 62.8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 15 October 2001 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 62 Watt |
GX-210JA has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 1600+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Athlon MP 1600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
