Celeron M 900: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 900
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.08

Celeron M 900 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.08% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

Intel started Celeron M 900 sales 1 April 2009 at a recommended price of $70. This is a Penryn architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2200 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is PGA478 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt.

Primary details

Celeron M 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking3385
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency0.22of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70of 17,906 (Xeon Platinum 8280L)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)
Threads1
Boost clock speed2.2 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus rate800 MHz
L2 cache1 MBof 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
Chip lithography45 nmof 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Die size107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cof 110 °C (Atom x7-E3950)
Number of transistors410 Millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 3100 ‑ 4500 (Ryzen 7 7435H)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron M 900. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 900 0.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 900 123

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 900 2101

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 900 1000

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Celeron M 900's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


Celeron M 900 100
Atom Z520 100

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron M 900 is C-30, which is faster by 38% and higher by 29 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron M 900:

E-240 150
C-30 137.5
Celeron M 900 100

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron M 900, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron M 900 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 26 configurations using Celeron M 900 in our database.

All comparisons with Celeron M 900

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.