Turion 64 X2 TL-68 vs Celeron M 900
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3401 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.22 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Tyler (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 1 January 2008 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Celeron M 900 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 X2 TL-68, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
