3015e vs Celeron M 900

Place in the ranking	3385	2042
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency	0.22	26.97
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date	1 April 2009 (15 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$70	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	4
Base clock speed	no data	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.3 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	no data	4 MB
Chip lithography	45 nm	14 nm
Die size	107 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	410 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PGA478	FT5
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 900 0.08

3015e 1.71
+2038%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 900 123

3015e 2712
+2105%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.08	1.71
Recency	1 April 2009	4 August 2020
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	4
Chip lithography	45 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

3015e has a 2037.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 900 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.