Turion X2 RM-77 vs Celeron M 900

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Turion X2 RM-77 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M2x AMD Turion
Power efficiency0.22no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Griffin (2008−2009)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Turion X2 RM-77 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz4000 MHz
L1 cacheno data0 MB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Turion X2 RM-77 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478Socket S1 (638)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Turion X2 RM-77. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 900 and Turion X2 RM-77 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2009 1 January 2009
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Celeron M 900 has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 RM-77, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 900 and Turion X2 RM-77. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Turion X2 RM-77, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 900
Celeron M 900
AMD Turion X2 RM-77
Turion X2 RM-77

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Turion X2 RM-77 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 900 or Turion X2 RM-77, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.