Celeron M 900 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023
96 cores / 192 threads, 350 Watt
96.70
+120775%
Celeron M 900
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.08

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Celeron M 900 by a whopping 120775% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23401
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency26.150.22
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores961 (Single-Core)
Threads1921
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache384 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm45 nm
Die sizeCompute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors78,840 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsTR5PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 96.70
+120775%
Celeron M 900 0.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 153598
+124776%
Celeron M 900 123

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 7951
+278%
Celeron M 900 2101

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 21375
+2038%
Celeron M 900 1000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 96.70 0.08
Recency 19 October 2023 1 April 2009
Physical cores 96 1
Threads 192 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has a 120775% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 900, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron M 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Intel Celeron M 900
Celeron M 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2398 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX or Celeron M 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.