Celeron Dual-Core T3500: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.80

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.80% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

Intel started Celeron Dual-Core T3500 sales 26 September 2010 at a recommended price of $80. This is a Penryn architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2100 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is Socket P PGA478 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt.

Primary details

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking2615
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency2.16of 100.00 (Ryzen Z1 Extreme)
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80of 17,906 (Xeon Platinum 8280L)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Boost clock speed2.1 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus rate800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBof 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache1 MBof 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
Chip lithography45 nmof 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Die size107 mm2
Number of transistors410 Millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 2063

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 4098

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1760

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Celeron Dual-Core T3500's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


A6-3410MX 100
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 100
A6-9220 100

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is A6-3410MX, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 8 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron Dual-Core T3500:

A4-5000 101.25
A6-9220 100
A6-3410MX 100
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 100
A6-9210 98.75
A4-9120 96.25

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron Dual-Core T3500, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 595 configurations using Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in our database.

All comparisons with Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


3.1 106 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.