Xeon Gold 6312U vs Celeron M 900

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 900
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.08
Xeon Gold 6312U
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
26.52
+33050%

Xeon Gold 6312U outperforms Celeron M 900 by a whopping 33050% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3385181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency0.2213.57
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads148
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 900 0.08
Xeon Gold 6312U 26.52
+33050%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 900 123
Xeon Gold 6312U 42124
+34147%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 26.52
Recency 1 April 2009 6 April 2021
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 185 Watt

Celeron M 900 has 428.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6312U, on the other hand, has a 33050% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6312U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 900 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6312U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Xeon Gold 6312U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 900
Celeron M 900
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Xeon Gold 6312U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6312U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 900 or Xeon Gold 6312U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.