Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3022 | 3294 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 | Pentium 4-M |
| Power efficiency | 1.19 | 0.50 |
| Architecture codename | Hawk-256 | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 30 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.39 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 30 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 has a 143.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, on the other hand, has 3.3% lower power consumption.
The Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
