Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs FX-9800P

Place in the ranking	2102	2974
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency	10.16	1.16
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Merom-2M (2008)
Release date	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.6 GHz	1.73 GHz
Bus rate	no data	533 MHz
L1 cache	320 KB	no data
L2 cache	1 MB (per module)	512 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	65 nm
Die size	250 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	3,100 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FP4	P
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3, DDR4

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.61
+274%

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 0.43

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

FX-9800P 14.4
+226%

Celeron Dual-Core T1400 47

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.61	0.43
Recency	31 May 2016	1 May 2008
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt

FX-9800P has a 274.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-9800P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.