Athlon Silver 3050e vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.85
+363%

Athlon Silver 3050e outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a whopping 363% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30032001
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency1.0829.16
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 0.40
Athlon Silver 3050e 1.85
+363%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1625
Athlon Silver 3050e 3339
+105%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 2960
Athlon Silver 3050e 6780
+129%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 1.85
Recency 1 May 2008 1 June 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Athlon Silver 3050e has a 362.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Silver 3050e is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e
Athlon Silver 3050e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 377 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1500 or Athlon Silver 3050e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.