Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1470 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 23.65 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 8 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4940 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 8 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 441.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
