C-50 vs Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.16
C-50
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.17
+6.3%

C-50 outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32763269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium 4-MAMD C-Series
Power efficiency0.501.79
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 0.16
C-50 0.17
+6.3%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 620
C-50 636
+2.5%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 247
C-50 111.2
+122%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.17
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 9 Watt

C-50 has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and C-50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
AMD C-50
C-50

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 268 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 or C-50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.