Ryzen 3 3350U vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 3350U outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a whopping 815% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 3350U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2988 | 1488 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | 23.09 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 3350U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4500 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 3350U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 3350U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 3.66 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 6 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3350U has a 815% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 441.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 3 3350U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 3 3350U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
