Radeon 890M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon 890M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.06

890M outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data185.6
Floating-point processing powerno data5.939 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.06
Radeon 890M 21.89
+118%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
Radeon 890M 9573
+91.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−144%
44
+144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−112%
140−150
+112%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−112%
140−150
+112%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−112%
140−150
+112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−116%
95−100
+116%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−114%
90−95
+114%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon 890M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 890M is 144% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 11 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.06 21.89
Recency 15 August 2020 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

Radeon 890M has a 117.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 890M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 107 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.