Radeon 680M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Place in the ranking	455	369
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	19.51
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	768
Core clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	105.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.95

Radeon 680M 14.17
+42.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Radeon 680M 6865
+37.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −54.2%	37 +54.2%
1440p	12−14 −50%	18 +50%
4K	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −43.8%	45−50 +43.8%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Fortnite	55−60 −37.9%	80−85 +37.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −40%	56 +40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −29.9%	100−105 +29.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Valorant	35−40 −335%	161 +335%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −43.8%	45−50 +43.8%
Dota 2	35−40 −33.3%	48 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +13.9%	36 −13.9%
Fortnite	55−60 −37.9%	80−85 +37.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −17.5%	47 +17.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −2.9%	36 +2.9%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −33.8%	100−110 +33.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −43.3%	40−45 +43.3%
Valorant	35−40 +23.3%	30 −23.3%
World of Tanks	140−150 −30.1%	180−190 +30.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −43.8%	45−50 +43.8%
Dota 2	35−40 −69.4%	61 +69.4%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −29.3%	50−55 +29.3%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −33.8%	100−110 +33.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60

−37.9%

80−85
+37.9%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −30.8%	17 +30.8%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Valorant	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −47.4%	27−30 +47.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −54.5%	30−35 +54.5%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −22.7%	27 +22.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

24−27

−40%

35−40
+40%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −25%	24−27 +25%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −25%	24−27 +25%
Valorant	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Dota 2	20−22 +11.1%	18 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−11

−40%

14−16
+40%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	28 +0%	28 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +0%	39 +0%
Elden Ring	34 +0%	34 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	23 +0%	23 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +0%	14 +0%
Metro Exodus	39 +0%	39 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21 +0%	21 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +0%	11 +0%
Elden Ring	66 +0%	66 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +0%	9 +0%
Valorant	146 +0%	146 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	17 +0%	17 +0%
Elden Ring	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
World of Tanks	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 +0%	5 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +0%	17 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Elden Ring	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2 +0%	2 +0%
Fortnite	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Valorant	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

Radeon 680M is 54% faster in 1080p
Radeon 680M is 50% faster in 1440p
Radeon 680M is 43% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 23% faster.
in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 680M is 335% faster.

All in all, in popular games: