GeForce GTX 780M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake-U G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
GTX 760A GTX 760M GTX 765M GTX 765M SLI GTX 770M GTX 770M SLI GTX 775M GTX 775M Mac Edition GTX 780M GTX 780M Mac Edition GTX 780M SLI GTX 960M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.02
+0.8%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GTX 780M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GTX 780M GTX 780M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking447449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.67
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)11 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961536
Core clock speedno data823 MHz
Boost clock speedno data797 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data122 Watt
Texture fill rateno data102.0
Floating-point processing powerno data2.448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 API
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.02
+0.8%
GTX 780M 9.94

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
GTX 780M 5244
+4.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−5%
63
+5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+52.9%
17
−52.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GTX 780M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M is 5% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 53% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 780M is 4% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 780M is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 62 tests (86%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.02 9.94
Recency 15 August 2020 11 May 2013
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 780M.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
vs
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 460 Mobile Radeon RX 460 Mobile
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
vs
GT 1010 GeForce GT 1010
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
vs
RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6500 XT
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 90nm Xbox 360 GPU 90nm
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
R9 M380 Radeon R9 M380
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 660 Ti GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
E9171 MCM Radeon E9171 MCM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.