GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs RTX A4500 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4500 Mobile with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 140 Watt
45.00
+140%

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking78298
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Power efficiency22.1328.67
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58882048
Core clock speed930 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate276.094.53
Floating-point processing power17.66 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs18464
Tensor Cores184256
Ray Tracing Cores4632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+138%
42
−138%
1440p75−80
+127%
33
−127%
4K60−65
+140%
25
−140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+172%
36
−172%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+100%
49
−100%
Elden Ring 160−170
+274%
43
−274%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+85%
60−65
−85%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+227%
30
−227%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+367%
21
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+197%
76
−197%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+95.5%
40−45
−95.5%
Valorant 180−190
+110%
87
−110%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+85%
60−65
−85%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+263%
27
−263%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+553%
15
−553%
Dota 2 130−140
+57.6%
85
−57.6%
Elden Ring 160−170
+173%
59
−173%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+47.1%
70
−47.1%
Fortnite 180−190
+88%
100−105
−88%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+259%
63
−259%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+94.2%
69
−94.2%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+64.1%
120−130
−64.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+95.5%
40−45
−95.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+183%
55−60
−183%
Valorant 180−190
+326%
43
−326%
World of Tanks 270−280
+25.1%
220−230
−25.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+85%
60−65
−85%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+197%
30−35
−197%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+654%
13
−654%
Dota 2 130−140
+21.8%
110
−21.8%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+60.9%
60−65
−60.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+304%
56
−304%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+64.1%
120−130
−64.1%
Valorant 180−190
+141%
75−80
−141%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 85−90
+130%
37
−130%
Elden Ring 95−100
+213%
30−35
−213%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+130%
37
−130%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4.8%
160−170
−4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+171%
16−18
−171%
World of Tanks 280−290
+123%
120−130
−123%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+108%
35−40
−108%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+200%
16−18
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+220%
14−16
−220%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+194%
45−50
−194%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+187%
47
−187%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+124%
40−45
−124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+232%
24−27
−232%
Valorant 150−160
+213%
45−50
−213%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+220%
14−16
−220%
Dota 2 90−95
+188%
30−35
−188%
Elden Ring 45−50
+262%
12−14
−262%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+188%
30−35
−188%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+168%
55−60
−168%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+191%
30−35
−191%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+220%
14−16
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Dota 2 90−95
+171%
34
−171%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+192%
24−27
−192%
Fortnite 65−70
+209%
21−24
−209%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+185%
27−30
−185%
Valorant 80−85
+268%
21−24
−268%

This is how RTX A4500 Mobile and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 138% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 127% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 140% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 654% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A4500 Mobile surpassed RTX 2050 Mobile in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.00 18.74
Recency 22 March 2022 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 45 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 140.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has 211.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2335 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.