Radeon PRO W7700 vs Quadro RTX A6000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon PRO W7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A6000
2020
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
58.59
+0.5%

RTX A6000 outperforms PRO W7700 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3841
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.4766.45
Power efficiency13.3921.03
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 October 2020 (4 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,649 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 535% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107523072
Core clock speed1410 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1800 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate604.8499.2
Floating-point processing power38.71 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs11296
TMUs336192
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores8448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A6000 58.59
+0.5%
PRO W7700 58.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A6000 22576
+0.5%
PRO W7700 22456

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD176
+3.5%
170−180
−3.5%
1440p131
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
4K122
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.415.88
1440p35.497.68
4K38.118.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+2.3%
130−140
−2.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%
Hitman 3 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+2.7%
150−160
−2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+2.3%
130−140
−2.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%
Hitman 3 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 293
+1%
290−300
−1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%
Hitman 3 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 224
+1.8%
220−230
−1.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 288
+2.9%
280−290
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180
+5.9%
170−180
−5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+4.5%
220−230
−4.5%
Hitman 3 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
+5%
200−210
−5%
Metro Exodus 63
+5%
60−65
−5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 247
+2.9%
240−250
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+4.2%
190−200
−4.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+4.4%
180−190
−4.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+4.3%
140−150
−4.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 149
+6.4%
140−150
−6.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

This is how RTX A6000 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 1% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.59 58.28
Recency 5 October 2020 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 190 Watt

RTX A6000 has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon PRO W7700.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 464 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.