Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce RTX 3070

Place in performance ranking	31	45
Place by popularity	46	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.95	24.86
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Ampere GA104	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 September 2020 (3 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$999
Current price	$662 (1.3x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3070 has 4% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5888	3072
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	317.4	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	242 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 57.97
+11.8%

PRO W7700 51.83

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Radeon PRO W7700 by 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3070 22387
+11.8%

PRO W7700 20016

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Radeon PRO W7700 by 12% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	145 +20.8%	120−130 −20.8%
1440p	99 +16.5%	85−90 −16.5%
4K	64 +16.4%	55−60 −16.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

160−170
+8.8%

147

−8.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +4%	125 −4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +10%	100 −10%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +8.7%	180−190 −8.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +10.1%	100−110 −10.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	150−160 +7.9%	139 −7.9%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +7.1%	140−150 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +9.9%	190−200 −9.9%
Hitman 3	120−130 +10.1%	109 −10.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +4.2%	288 −4.2%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +11.1%	144 −11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +10.2%	118 −10.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −3.7%	311 +3.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +7.4%	121 −7.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +2.8%	107 −2.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 +9.2%	87 −9.2%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +8.7%	180−190 −8.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +10.1%	100−110 −10.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +11.1%	126 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +7.1%	140−150 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +9.9%	190−200 −9.9%
Hitman 3	110−120 +10%	100 −10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	270−280 +11.6%	240−250 −11.6%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +5.3%	133 −5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +11.1%	117 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	280−290 +9.8%	255 −9.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	250−260 +8.7%	230 −8.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 +6.7%	178 −6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +11.1%	81 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +9%	78 −9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +10.1%	100−110 −10.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +7.8%	102 −7.8%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +9.9%	190−200 −9.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 +10.5%	181 −10.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 +7.6%	223 −7.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +7.4%	121 −7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +11.8%	85 −11.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130
+3.4%

116

−3.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	130−140 +4%	120−130 −4%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +11.1%	144 −11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +10.3%	68 −10.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +7.7%	65 −7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +8.7%	90−95 −8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +4.8%	62 −4.8%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +9.2%	119 −9.2%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +6.9%	130−140 −6.9%
Hitman 3	100−105 +4.2%	96 −4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +9.6%	146 −9.6%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +8.9%	101 −8.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +8.4%	166 −8.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +2%	95−100 −2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +6.1%	66 −6.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130
+5.3%

114

−5.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +7.7%	65−70 −7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
Hitman 3	55−60 +5.8%	52 −5.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +8.4%	80−85 −8.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +4.8%	62 −4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +11.1%	90 −11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +4.2%	48 −4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +4.7%	43 −4.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +9.8%	40−45 −9.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +0%	30 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +5.3%	35−40 −5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +6.7%	85−90 −6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +6.7%	89 −6.7%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +5.6%	71 −5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +5.3%	38 −5.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+8.7%

−8.7%

This is how RTX 3070 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 is 21% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 is 16% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 is 16% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	57.97	51.83
Recency	16 September 2020	13 November 2023
Cost	$499	$999
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	190 Watt