Radeon PRO W7900 vs Quadro RTX A6000

Place in the ranking	38	11
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.80	17.21
Power efficiency	13.45	17.59
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA102	Navi 31
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	5 October 2020 (4 years ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,649	$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7900 has 59% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10752	6144
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	1855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1800 MHz	2495 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	295 Watt
Texture fill rate	604.8	958.1
Floating-point processing power	38.71 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	192
TMUs	336	384
Tensor Cores	336	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	84	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	280 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin EPS	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	768.0 GB/s	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A6000 58.62

PRO W7900 75.37
+28.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A6000 22535

PRO W7900 28976
+28.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	175 −25.7%	220−230 +25.7%
1440p	129 −24%	160−170 +24%
4K	114 −22.8%	140−150 +22.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	26.57 −46.1%	18.18 +46.1%
1440p	36.04 −44.2%	24.99 +44.2%
4K	40.78 −42.8%	28.56 +42.8%

PRO W7900 has 46% lower cost per frame in 1080p
PRO W7900 has 44% lower cost per frame in 1440p
PRO W7900 has 43% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	130−140 −25.9%	170−180 +25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 −21.2%	160−170 +21.2%
Elden Ring	210−220 −27.9%	280−290 +27.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −28.2%	150−160 +28.2%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 −25.9%	170−180 +25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 −21.2%	160−170 +21.2%
Forza Horizon 4	300 −16.7%	350−400 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	66 −21.2%	80−85 +21.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 −21.5%	130−140 +21.5%
Valorant	260−270 −14.9%	300−310 +14.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −28.2%	150−160 +28.2%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 −25.9%	170−180 +25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 −21.2%	160−170 +21.2%
Dota 2	132 −21.2%	160−170 +21.2%
Elden Ring	210−220 −27.9%	280−290 +27.9%
Far Cry 5	78 −28.2%	100−105 +28.2%
Fortnite	230−240 −25.5%	290−300 +25.5%
Forza Horizon 4	293 −19.5%	350−400 +19.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	128 −25%	160−170 +25%
Metro Exodus	78 −28.2%	100−105 +28.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 −25.6%	270−280 +25.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 −21.5%	130−140 +21.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 −26.4%	220−230 +26.4%
Valorant	260−270 −14.9%	300−310 +14.9%
World of Tanks	270−280 −25.4%	350−400 +25.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −28.2%	150−160 +28.2%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 −25.9%	170−180 +25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 −21.2%	160−170 +21.2%
Dota 2	131 −22.1%	160−170 +22.1%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −28.2%	150−160 +28.2%
Forza Horizon 4	288 −21.5%	350−400 +21.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 −25.6%	270−280 +25.6%
Valorant	260−270 −14.9%	300−310 +14.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	96 −25%	120−130 +25%
Elden Ring	140−150 −26.8%	180−190 +26.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	96 −25%	120−130 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −25.7%	220−230 +25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −25%	85−90 +25%
World of Tanks	350−400 −16.9%	450−500 +16.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 −26.4%	110−120 +26.4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −25%	90−95 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −25%	90−95 +25%
Far Cry 5	160−170 −25%	200−210 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	247 −21.5%	300−310 +21.5%
Metro Exodus	63 −27%	80−85 +27%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −24%	150−160 +24%
Valorant	220−230 −27.8%	290−300 +27.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −25%	85−90 +25%
Dota 2	155 −22.6%	190−200 +22.6%
Elden Ring	70−75 −25%	90−95 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	155 −22.6%	190−200 +22.6%
Metro Exodus	70 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −25%	260−270 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −25%	55−60 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	155 −22.6%	190−200 +22.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −28.4%	95−100 +28.4%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −25%	85−90 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Dota 2	128 −25%	160−170 +25%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −23.8%	130−140 +23.8%
Fortnite	95−100 −25%	120−130 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	149 −27.5%	190−200 +27.5%
Valorant	120−130 −26%	160−170 +26%

This is how RTX A6000 and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

PRO W7900 is 26% faster in 1080p
PRO W7900 is 24% faster in 1440p
PRO W7900 is 23% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	58.62	75.37
Recency	5 October 2020	13 April 2023
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	295 Watt

PRO W7900 has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 1.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX A6000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.