GeForce GTX 1070 vs Quadro P4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 with GeForce GTX 1070, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4000
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.18

GTX 1070 outperforms Quadro P4000 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking171137
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.9327.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104Pascal GP104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)6 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 $379
Current price$485 (0.6x MSRP)$180 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 has 5% better value for money than Quadro P4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921920
CUDA coresno data1920
Core clock speed1202 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate165.8202.0
Floating-point performance5,304 gflops6,463 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm10.5" (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width1-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data500 Watt
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7604 MHz8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s256 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Display Port1.4no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data3.0
Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Anselno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4000 30.18
GTX 1070 34.99
+15.9%

GeForce GTX 1070 outperforms Quadro P4000 by 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P4000 11655
GTX 1070 13511
+15.9%

GeForce GTX 1070 outperforms Quadro P4000 by 16% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P4000 39075
GTX 1070 44986
+15.1%

GeForce GTX 1070 outperforms Quadro P4000 by 15% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P4000 41601
GTX 1070 46299
+11.3%

GeForce GTX 1070 outperforms Quadro P4000 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P4000 38590
GTX 1070 45301
+17.4%

GeForce GTX 1070 outperforms Quadro P4000 by 17% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
−79.4%
122
+79.4%
1440p55−60
−21.8%
67
+21.8%
4K40−45
−25%
50
+25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55 no data
Battlefield 5 95−100 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Hitman 3 60−65 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 90−95 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55 no data
Battlefield 5 95−100 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Hitman 3 60−65 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 90−95 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

This is how Quadro P4000 and GTX 1070 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 is 79% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 is 22% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.18 34.99
Recency 6 February 2017 6 May 2016
Cost $815 $379
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 280 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7640 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.