RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe MAX Graphics with RTX 5000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020
4 GB LPDDR4X, 25 Watt
5.11

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by a whopping 1320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61716
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.1620.10
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG1AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76812800
Core clock speed300 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate79.201,020
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs24176
TMUs48400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.11
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 72.56
+1320%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 27999
+1321%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
1440p17
−1312%
240−250
+1312%
4K16
−1275%
220−230
+1275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−1289%
250−260
+1289%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−1268%
260−270
+1268%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−1289%
500−550
+1289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−1289%
250−260
+1289%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−1306%
450−500
+1306%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−1282%
1050−1100
+1282%
Hitman 3 24
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Metro Exodus 57
−1304%
800−850
+1304%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−1264%
450−500
+1264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−1251%
500−550
+1251%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−1297%
950−1000
+1297%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−1289%
500−550
+1289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−1289%
250−260
+1289%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−1306%
450−500
+1306%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−1282%
1050−1100
+1282%
Hitman 3 23
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Metro Exodus 43
−1295%
600−650
+1295%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−1306%
450−500
+1306%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−1264%
450−500
+1264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−1279%
400−450
+1279%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−1297%
950−1000
+1297%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−1289%
250−260
+1289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−1289%
250−260
+1289%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−1282%
1050−1100
+1282%
Hitman 3 21
−1281%
290−300
+1281%
Horizon Zero Dawn 26
−1246%
350−400
+1246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
−1279%
400−450
+1279%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−1289%
250−260
+1289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−1297%
950−1000
+1297%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 25
−1300%
350−400
+1300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−1312%
240−250
+1312%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−1289%
750−800
+1289%
Hitman 3 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−1289%
250−260
+1289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−1300%
280−290
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−1289%
1000−1050
+1289%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−1268%
260−270
+1268%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−1246%
700−750
+1246%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−1264%
150−160
+1264%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%

This is how Iris Xe MAX Graphics and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 1196% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 1312% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 1275% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.11 72.56
Recency 31 October 2020 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1320% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 252 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 74 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.