Arc A580 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500 XT and Arc A580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6500 XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 107 Watt
24.83

Arc A580 outperforms RX 6500 XT by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking220184
Place by popularity8367
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.69no data
Power efficiency15.9111.91
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243072
Core clock speed2610 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2815 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate180.2384.0
Floating-point processing power5.765 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Cores1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2248 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.83
Arc A580 30.41
+22.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500 XT 9569
Arc A580 11717
+22.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6500 XT 22954
Arc A580 35210
+53.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6500 XT 76445
Arc A580 95677
+25.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6500 XT 15712
Arc A580 27574
+75.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6500 XT 91909
Arc A580 113974
+24%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6500 XT 356129
Arc A580 593548
+66.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
−66.1%
103
+66.1%
1440p28
−92.9%
54
+92.9%
4K16
−100%
32
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.21no data
1440p7.11no data
4K12.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−90.7%
103
+90.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
−66.7%
85
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−64.2%
130−140
+64.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−68%
80−85
+68%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−56.1%
85−90
+56.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−56.9%
100−110
+56.9%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−35.9%
190−200
+35.9%
Hitman 3 50−55
−78%
85−90
+78%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−50%
170−180
+50%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−54.1%
130−140
+54.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−83.3%
150−160
+83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−28.2%
130−140
+28.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−88.9%
102
+88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
−69.8%
73
+69.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−64.2%
130−140
+64.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−68%
80−85
+68%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−56.1%
85−90
+56.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−56.9%
100−110
+56.9%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−35.9%
190−200
+35.9%
Hitman 3 50−55
−78%
85−90
+78%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−50%
170−180
+50%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−54.1%
130−140
+54.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107
−100%
214
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−62.3%
85−90
+62.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−28.2%
130−140
+28.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−18.5%
64
+18.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
−106%
64
+106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−68%
80−85
+68%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−56.1%
85−90
+56.1%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+66.7%
87
−66.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
−78%
85−90
+78%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
−18.5%
109
+18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
−113%
177
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
−25.9%
68
+25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−140%
60
+140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−48.4%
95−100
+48.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−72.3%
80−85
+72.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−68.4%
60−65
+68.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−108%
54
+108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 23
−122%
51
+122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−75%
45−50
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−71.4%
45−50
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−63.1%
230−240
+63.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 66
−31.8%
87
+31.8%
Metro Exodus 57
−59.6%
91
+59.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
−132%
130
+132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−83.3%
55
+83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−41.4%
190−200
+41.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−75.6%
70−75
+75.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Hitman 3 10
−240%
30−35
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−48%
180−190
+48%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−92.9%
50−55
+92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−118%
61
+118%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−133%
35
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−400%
30
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−64.7%
56
+64.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
−192%
73
+192%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
−170%
27
+170%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%

This is how RX 6500 XT and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 66% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 93% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 67% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A580 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A580 is ahead in 65 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.83 30.41
Recency 19 January 2022 10 October 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 107 Watt 175 Watt

RX 6500 XT has 63.6% lower power consumption.

Arc A580, on the other hand, has a 22.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3307 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 283 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.