Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Place in the ranking	482	456
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.64	no data
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	96
Core clock speed	400 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR4
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 8.60

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.28
+7.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+2.8%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27 +0%	27−30 +0%
1440p	16 +0%	16−18 +0%
4K	11 +10%	10−12 −10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 −5%	21−24 +5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%
Counter-Strike 2	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	38 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 5	22 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Metro Exodus	29 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
Valorant	26 −46.2%	35−40 +46.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%
Counter-Strike 2	12 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Dota 2	28 −28.6%	35−40 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	31 −29%	40−45 +29%
Fortnite	50−55 −7.4%	55−60 +7.4%
Forza Horizon 4	30 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	17 −112%	35−40 +112%
Metro Exodus	19 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −6.9%	75−80 +6.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8 −225%	24−27 +225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Valorant	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
World of Tanks	96 −49%	140−150 +49%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%
Counter-Strike 2	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	47 +30.6%	35−40 −30.6%
Far Cry 5	34 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Forza Horizon 4	24 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	22 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −6.9%	75−80 +6.9%
Valorant	23 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7 +0%	7−8 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
World of Tanks	65−70 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	3 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −10%	21−24 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	19 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Valorant	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	8 +0%	8−9 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	8 −150%	20−22 +150%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −150%	20−22 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	20 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Fortnite	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

30−33

+0%

30−33

+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60

+0%

55−60

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

A tie in 1080p
A tie in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 31% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 225% faster.

All in all, in popular games: