Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
7.94

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491468
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.44no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR4
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 7.94
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 8.56
+7.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+2.8%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+0%
27−30
+0%
1440p15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
4K12
+0%
12−14
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Battlefield 5 41
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Fortnite 30
−86.7%
55−60
+86.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 5 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.5%
30−35
+6.5%
Valorant 124
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 35
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
−46.9%
140−150
+46.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Dota 2 51
−31.4%
65−70
+31.4%
Far Cry 5 25
−24%
30−35
+24%
Fortnite 21
−167%
55−60
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−106%
35−40
+106%
Metro Exodus 15
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.5%
30−35
+6.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+20%
24−27
−20%
Valorant 112
+24.4%
90−95
−24.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
−36.7%
40−45
+36.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Dota 2 47
−42.6%
65−70
+42.6%
Far Cry 5 23
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.5%
30−35
+6.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Valorant 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 15
−273%
55−60
+273%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−7.6%
70−75
+7.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Valorant 95−100
−7.2%
100−110
+7.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−10%
21−24
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
−150%
20−22
+150%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Valorant 45−50
−8.9%
45−50
+8.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20
−70%
30−35
+70%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 7% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 38% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 273% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 4 tests (10%)
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 36 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.94 8.56

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 7.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
R9 M390X Radeon R9 M390X
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
RX Vega 5 RX Vega 5
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
Graphics 448SP Radeon Graphics 448SP
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
RX 6900 XT RX 6900 XT
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1650 TU116
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
RTX 3080 RTX 3080

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 1009 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.