GeForce GTX 560 vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with GeForce GTX 560, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
28.90
+304%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms GTX 560 by a whopping 304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking194546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.001.86
Power efficiency24.773.27
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU116GF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)17 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 5276% better value for money than GTX 560.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536336
Core clock speed1455 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data99 °C
Texture fill rate152.645.36
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS1.089 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs9656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 28.90
+304%
GTX 560 7.15

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818
+389%
GTX 560 3030

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+319%
21−24
−319%
1440p58
+314%
14−16
−314%
4K32
+357%
7−8
−357%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.609.48
1440p3.9514.21
4K7.1628.43

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 86
+310%
21−24
−310%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+344%
18−20
−344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+313%
16−18
−313%
Battlefield 5 129
+330%
30−33
−330%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+356%
18−20
−356%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+325%
16−18
−325%
Far Cry 5 98
+308%
24−27
−308%
Far Cry New Dawn 102
+325%
24−27
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+305%
75−80
−305%
Hitman 3 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
Horizon Zero Dawn 209
+318%
50−55
−318%
Metro Exodus 126
+320%
30−33
−320%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+313%
24−27
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 155
+343%
35−40
−343%
Watch Dogs: Legion 225
+309%
55−60
−309%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
+317%
30−33
−317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+308%
12−14
−308%
Battlefield 5 109
+354%
24−27
−354%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 73
+306%
18−20
−306%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+350%
12−14
−350%
Far Cry 5 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
Far Cry New Dawn 70
+338%
16−18
−338%
Forza Horizon 4 256
+327%
60−65
−327%
Hitman 3 74
+311%
18−20
−311%
Horizon Zero Dawn 207
+314%
50−55
−314%
Metro Exodus 104
+333%
24−27
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 83
+361%
18−20
−361%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+337%
27−30
−337%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 214
+328%
50−55
−328%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+342%
12−14
−342%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+342%
12−14
−342%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+333%
12−14
−333%
Far Cry 5 57
+307%
14−16
−307%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+313%
24−27
−313%
Hitman 3 63
+350%
14−16
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
+329%
21−24
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+321%
24−27
−321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+358%
12−14
−358%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+313%
8−9
−313%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+344%
18−20
−344%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+313%
16−18
−313%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
+360%
10−11
−360%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+350%
8−9
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+357%
7−8
−357%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Far Cry 5 36
+350%
8−9
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 182
+304%
45−50
−304%
Hitman 3 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+306%
16−18
−306%
Metro Exodus 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
+306%
50−55
−306%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+367%
12−14
−367%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+343%
7−8
−343%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Hitman 3 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 76
+322%
18−20
−322%
Metro Exodus 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+338%
8−9
−338%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+375%
4−5
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
+333%
3−4
−333%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+350%
6−7
−350%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GTX 560 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 319% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 314% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 357% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.90 7.15
Recency 23 April 2019 17 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 304.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1575 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1079 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.