ATI GameCube GPU vs GeForce MX150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking586not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 5 (2000)
GPU code nameN17S-G1Flipper
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 May 2017 (7 years ago)24 August 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1468 MHz162 MHz
Boost clock speed1532 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 million51 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (10 - 25 Watt TGP)45 Watt
Texture fill rate24.910.65
Floating-point performance0.7972 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz162 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s1.296 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0+
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 May 2017 24 August 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

GeForce MX150 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX150 and GameCube GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook card while GameCube GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
ATI GameCube GPU
GameCube GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1586 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 31 vote

Rate GameCube GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.