GeForce2 Go vs GeForce MX150

Place in the ranking	592	1512
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	40.61	0.34
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	GP108	NV11 B2
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	17 May 2017 (7 years ago)	11 November 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	937 MHz	143 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,800 million	20 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	2 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.91	0.57
Floating-point processing power	0.7972 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	2
TMUs	24	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	5.312 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	7.0
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX150 5.90
+58900%

GeForce2 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2270
+56650%

GeForce2 Go 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	26	-0−1
1440p	28	-0−1
4K	20	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	0−1
Elden Ring	14−16	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	15	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27	0−1
Metro Exodus	18	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	27	0−1
Valorant	24	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3	0−1
Dota 2	40	0−1
Elden Ring	13	0−1
Far Cry 5	42	0−1
Fortnite	29	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	21	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	26	0−1
Metro Exodus	11	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	56	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22	0−1
Valorant	17	0−1
World of Tanks	87	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	0−1
Dota 2	62	0−1
Far Cry 5	26	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	16	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	19	0−1
Valorant	16−18	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6	0−1
Elden Ring	5	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	43	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6	0−1
World of Tanks	55	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−11	0−1
Metro Exodus	7−8	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8	0−1
Valorant	16−18	0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18	0−1
Elden Ring	3−4	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18	0−1
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	0−1
World of Tanks	30	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	24	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8	0−1
Fortnite	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6	0−1
Valorant	5−6	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.90	0.01
Recency	17 May 2017	11 November 2000
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	2 Watt

GeForce MX150 has a 58900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Go in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.