Xeon 3.2 vs Celeron M 370

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Celeron M	no data
Architecture codename	Dothan (2004−2005)	Irwindale (2004)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.2 GHz
Bus rate	400 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	16 KB
L2 cache	no data	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 KB
Chip lithography	90 nm	90 nm
Die size	no data	169 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	178 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.004V-1.292V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478	604
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Power consumption (TDP)

21 Watt

135 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---