Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 461 | 953 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 736 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 655 / 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | no data |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 130−140
+465%
| 23
−465%
|
| Full HD | 100−110
+488%
| 17
−488%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+1267%
|
3−4
−1267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60
+1020%
|
5−6
−1020%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+413%
|
8−9
−413%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+150%
|
35−40
−150%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+1267%
|
3−4
−1267%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+223%
|
44
−223%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+258%
|
18−20
−258%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60
+1020%
|
5−6
−1020%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+413%
|
8−9
−413%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+1650%
|
2−3
−1650%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+300%
|
6−7
−300%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+150%
|
35−40
−150%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+1267%
|
3−4
−1267%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+258%
|
18−20
−258%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+413%
|
8−9
−413%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+300%
|
6−7
−300%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
+1020%
|
5−6
−1020%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+610%
|
10−11
−610%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+1056%
|
9−10
−1056%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+667%
|
3−4
−667%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+513%
|
8−9
−513%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+1600%
|
2−3
−1600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:
- Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 465% faster in 900p
- Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 488% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 1650% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 32 tests (62%)
- there's a draw in 20 tests (38%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.95 | 1.67 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 15 May 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 495.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
