Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 947 | 534 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.62 |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | no data | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 736 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 23
−335%
| 100−110
+335%
|
| Full HD | 16
−18.8%
| 19
+18.8%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−450%
| 11
+450%
|
| 4K | 3−4
−400%
| 15
+400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−57.1%
|
11
+57.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−180%
|
14
+180%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12
+71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−140%
|
12
+140%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−200%
|
30
+200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2600%
|
27
+2600%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−200%
|
21−24
+200%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10
+42.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 3−4
−633%
|
22
+633%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−117%
|
26
+117%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−463%
|
45−50
+463%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−140%
|
24
+140%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
−333%
|
13
+333%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−1600%
|
17
+1600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−259%
|
60−65
+259%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6
−16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−188%
|
21−24
+188%
|
| World of Tanks | 44
−161%
|
110−120
+161%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9
+28.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4
−25%
|
| Dota 2 | 3−4
−1100%
|
36
+1100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−175%
|
30−35
+175%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−100%
|
20
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−259%
|
60−65
+259%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−255%
|
35−40
+255%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| World of Tanks | 10−11
−450%
|
55−60
+450%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−100%
|
10
+100%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−171%
|
18−20
+171%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−340%
|
21−24
+340%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Valorant | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Valorant | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 5 | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Fortnite | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 335% faster in 900p
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 19% faster in 1080p
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 450% faster in 1440p
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 400% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 25% faster.
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 2600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 41 test (65%)
- there's a draw in 20 tests (32%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.60 | 7.23 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 351.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
