GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.05

RTX 3060 Mobile outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450168
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiencyno data27.91
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963840
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data171.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.94 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.05
RTX 3060 Mobile 32.57
+224%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
RTX 3060 Mobile 20609
+312%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−227%
98
+227%
1440p18−21
−267%
66
+267%
4K12−14
−233%
40
+233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−242%
100−110
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−230%
65−70
+230%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−217%
70−75
+217%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−193%
80−85
+193%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−162%
170−180
+162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−163%
140−150
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−259%
110−120
+259%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−242%
100−110
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−230%
65−70
+230%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−217%
70−75
+217%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−193%
80−85
+193%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−162%
170−180
+162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−250%
189
+250%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−316%
129
+316%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−278%
102
+278%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−394%
158
+394%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−162%
65−70
+162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−217%
70−75
+217%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−162%
170−180
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−200%
78
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−245%
35−40
+245%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−325%
180−190
+325%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−281%
160−170
+281%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−650%
60
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−686%
55
+686%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 103
+0%
103
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Hitman 3 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 164
+0%
164
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+0%
64
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Hitman 3 108
+0%
108
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 158
+0%
158
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hitman 3 96
+0%
96
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
+0%
120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
+0%
140
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+0%
96
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Hitman 3 64
+0%
64
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 116
+0%
116
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+0%
80
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+0%
11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
+0%
60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+0%
19
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and RTX 3060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 227% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 267% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 233% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 Mobile is 686% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is ahead in 33 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.05 32.57
Recency 15 August 2020 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

RTX 3060 Mobile has a 224.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5022 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.