Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 780M

Place in the ranking	455	475
Place by popularity	not in top-100	87
Power efficiency	5.54	22.56
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GK104	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 May 2013 (11 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	96
Core clock speed	823 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	797 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	102.0	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.448 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	128	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.86
+7.1%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.21

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 780M 7777
+19.6%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 780M 26827
+3.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780M 5244
+2%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 780M 35965
+33.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65 +150%	26 −150%
1440p	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%
4K	10−12 −10%	11 +10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−33.3%

20
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +9.1%	22 −9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −40%	21 +40%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +6.9%	27−30 −6.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −80%	36 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −6.7%	16 +6.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +4.5%	21−24 −4.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +7.7%	24−27 −7.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +4.8%	60−65 −4.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 −26.3%	24 +26.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −125%	124 +125%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −9.4%	35 +9.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +64.7%	17 −64.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +6.5%	30−35 −6.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −42.9%	90 +42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −20%	18 +20%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +6.9%	27−30 −6.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −60%	32 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +15.4%	13 −15.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +4.5%	21−24 −4.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +7.7%	24−27 −7.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +4.8%	60−65 −4.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 −21.1%	23 +21.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −104%	112 +104%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +14.3%	28 −14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +7.7%	26 −7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +10%	30 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −33.3%	84 +33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +71.4%	14 −71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −15%	23 +15%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +36.4%	11 −36.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +4.5%	21−24 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +4.8%	60−65 −4.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 −5.3%	20 +5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +139%	23 −139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +37.5%	24 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +21.4%	14 −21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+100%

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7 +40%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +7.3%	40−45 −7.3%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −46.2%	19 +46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +5%	60−65 −5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+6.3%

16−18

−6.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Hitman 3	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +10.3%	35−40 −10.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −71.4%	12 +71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −57.1%	11 +57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

This is how GTX 780M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

GTX 780M is 150% faster in 1080p
GTX 780M is 7% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 780M is 139% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 125% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 780M is ahead in 43 tests (60%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 19 tests (26%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.86	9.21
Recency	11 May 2013	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	28 Watt

GTX 780M has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 335.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 780M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.